Skip to content
Bloch Agents

Notaries

The delay almost never comes from the office

5 min read

A client who has been given a completion date asks only one person about it: their notary. Yet the notary is the one actor in the chain who decides almost none of the dates that date depends on.

This article describes a use case. We have not delivered an engagement in a notarial office: what follows is what we observe of the profession, its statutory delays and its tools.

A file is not waiting on the notary

Between the preliminary contract and completion, a sale file spends most of its life waiting, and almost never on the office.

It waits on a local authority that has to decide whether to pre-empt. On a bank that issues an offer, then on a borrower who cannot accept it straight away. On a building manager who has to be asked where the co-ownership stands and what the seller still owes it. On a civil status registry, a land surveyor, a building condition surveyor, sometimes a second office when each party has its own notary.

Each of those third parties works at its own pace, on its own priorities, with no visibility into the file it contributes to — and no reason to want any.

The clocks are not the office’s

These are not administrative slowness. They are, for the most part, delays the legislator intended, and they protect the buyer or the creditor.

  • A non-professional buyer of residential property has a withdrawal period, running from the day after the letter notifying them of the deed is first presented. Received in authentic form with no preliminary contract, the sale instead opens a reflection period on the draft as notified.
  • A disposal subject to urban pre-emption requires, on pain of nullity, a prior declaration addressed to the town hall of the commune. Silence from the holder of the right, for the period open to it, amounts to a waiver: the office is therefore not waiting for an answer, it is waiting for time to pass.
  • A borrower cannot accept a mortgage offer before a reflection period has expired, and their acceptance must be capable of being dated.
  • In a co-ownership, absent a recent certificate from the building manager showing the seller is clear, the notary must give notice of the transfer, and the manager may file an objection to obtain the sums still owed. The funds are not released until that is settled.

None of this is up for discussion, and nobody wants it to be. It has, all the same, a concrete consequence for how an office runs: the completion date is not decided, it is observed — on the day the last of those clocks finishes running.

The office is the only visible counter

The client does not see the chain: they see a professional who met them, who holds their file and who mentioned a timetable. The estate agent calls for the same reason, the seller to find out when the money lands, the bank to align its own deadlines.

Everything converges on the same desk, and every call costs the same: reopen the file, reconstruct what has arrived, what is missing, since when, and who has already been chased. That work produces nothing: it says out loud a state of play nobody holds in writing.

What the software holds, and what it does not

The notarial profession’s approved solutions — iNot, Genapi, Fichorga — hold the file, the deed, the formalities, the retention. They are built for that and they do it well. They are also closed, like almost every system serving a regulated profession: nothing outside writes into them, and that is not vendor negligence, it is the vendor’s model.

What none of them holds is the state of the waiting. Which files are suspended, on what, since when, and which of those silences is abnormal. The information exists — in someone’s head, in a mailbox, on a sheet kept alongside the tool. Nowhere in a form anyone can consult.

What an office lacks is not a tool for drafting. It is someone whose job would be to know, without thinking about it, which file is waiting on what, and since when.

What an agent could take on

Nothing touching the deed, the advice or the signature. Only the keeping of the waiting.

  • Maintaining, from what already comes into the office, the state of what each file is waiting on, and correcting it as a document or an answer arrives.
  • Separating normal silence from abnormal silence: a statutory period that is running calls for no chasing, a third party still silent well beyond its usual turnaround does.
  • Preparing requests and reminders in the expected form, so that a clerk only has to read them over and decide whether to send them.
  • Flagging that a file has become ready to complete on the day its last condition falls, rather than the following week, when someone reopens it for another reason.

None of those gestures would decide anything: they would produce information for a notary or a clerk, who would keep control of everything that leaves the office. In a profession where the deed engages a public officer’s personal liability, that is the only way to approach the subject at all.

Why all of this is in the conditional

Because we have delivered nothing to a notarial office, and writing otherwise would be false.

What we know how to do is established elsewhere: working inside closed practice software, on a machine the firm controls, without taking the data out of it. What that would give in a notarial office remains to be written, and it starts by watching a real week of live files.


Engagements we have actually delivered and use cases are explicitly distinguished in our resources.

All articles

Does any of that sound familiar?

If you work in a regulated profession and spend your days inside software that will not automate, the best next step is a conversation.